2026 short story competition

Stories from where we live and work

Celebrating the winners of the Checketts McKay Short Story Competition 2026.

About the collection

Celebrating stories of place

This collection brings together selected entries from the Checketts McKay Short Story Competition. The open category is nationwide for writers aged 18+, while the school categories are for schools in Central Otago and Queenstown Lakes. Each story has some connection to this place, whether through landscape, history, memory, community, or imagination.

2026 awards

Winners and commendations

Judged by Rosemary Riddell and Bridget Auchmuty, assisted by Annie Villiers as Chief Sifter.

The 2026 results are now available. Select any story title to read it in the collection, or read the Open Category judges’ report and the School Competition judges’ report.

From the judges

Open Category judges’ report

The short story is a notoriously difficult genre to write. There’s no room to ramble, little space for back story or description, and character has to be shown by a few well-chosen and subtle details. Aotearoa New Zealand has a long tradition of excellent short story writers: think Katherine Mansfield, Frank Sargeson, Keri Hulme and Owen Marshall to name just a few. Internationally there are many, many writers who have perfected the genre: Alice Munro, John Cheever, Anton Chekhov, Anita Desai – the list goes on. If you want to write short stories, you really need to read short stories too, to see what works and how.

What we were looking for in the competition was first of all a good story, something that drew us in right from the start. Stream of consciousness doth not a story make. A useful rule of thumb is to jump straight in to the action. Many stories could have been improved by cutting the first page or two – it sounds brutal, but often works. There needs to be a story arc: something needs to have changed, or a character needs to have learnt something by the end. There’s a danger here of wrapping things up too neatly, though, which can lead to a story seeming trite, so some stories not only needed to start later, but end sooner, leaving the reader to join the dots.

A good short story also has strong characterisation. You can show character through the way people speak, and the implication of back story, but every detail needs to be there for a reason. That goes for every element in a story: there’s an old saying that if there’s a loaded gun on a table it has to go off by the end. It’s particularly true for description of place. None of us lives in a vacuum and we are moulded by the environment in which we live. We asked for stories to have a link to Central Otago, so the setting (and there were some very evocative descriptions) needed to be relevant to the plot. Could this have taken place anywhere else in the country or the world?

After many readings the place-getters were really quite clear. First prize goes to Walter McKenzie. It’s a quiet story, and we loved the skillful development of character and the growing relationship between the two men. There were some absolutely beautiful turns of phrase and telling details. This was a story that stayed with us over several weeks. A close second is New Gold and like the first prizewinner, avoided the pitfall of tying up ends too neatly. There was a skillful interweaving of different elements of the story, and a subtle feeding in of information as it was needed. Like Walter McKenzie, the characters felt true to life and the story had the added bonus of conveying the fragility of the precious ecosystem of our unique environment in Central Otago. Third place goes to Schist Happens. This was laugh-out-loud funny. It’s a mark of skillful writing and good characterisation with distinct voices that such an implausible story could suspend our disbelief.

The four entries that we highly commend were all good stories, but didn’t quite get into the top three for some of the reasons outlined above: they needed to either start later or finish sooner, or they might have been a bit clichéd or predictable. Those four (in no particular order) are Jumbo’s Big Reunion, Resignation, The Raft, and Good Prospects.

This is the first time that Checketts McKay Law has sponsored a short story competition. We hope that this initiative will encourage good writing in the region for many years to come.

Bridget Auchmuty and Rosemary Riddell

School competition

School Competition

Celebrating the winning and commended stories from young writers across Central Otago and Queenstown Lakes.

School category

Years 9–13

First place

After the ThawJack Letts · Dunstan High School

Second place

300 KilosOiva Kiuru · Dunstan High School

Third place

The Pie PerpetratorArchie McNeish · Dunstan High School

Highly commended

The New GirlNicole Gumasing · Cromwell College

Drowned VillageArlee Sutherland · Dunstan High School

The Colour of GoldMia Reardon · Mount Aspiring College

Meeting KurtJames Allan · Mount Aspiring College

The Unpaid Price for GoldEli Moir · Dunstan High School

Commended

A Happy HomeAngus Keane · Dunstan High School

The ClockCohen Brown · Dunstan High School

White DeathCharlie Diver · Dunstan High School

School category

Years 5–6

First place

Mystery in OmakauEmma Bartlett · Omakau Primary School

Highly commended

The ObeliskTarn Yeoman · St Gerards Primary School

The MonsterMadison Speight · Cromwell Primary School

The Big FruitEdie Harkness · Goldfields Primary School

Presentation moments

Awards in our schools

Celebrating the young writers recognised at school assemblies across Central Otago and Queenstown Lakes.

Jack Letts holding his Years 9–13 first-place certificate and prize
Dunstan High School Years 9–13 first-place recipient Jack Letts
Six Dunstan High School students holding their competition certificates and prizes
Dunstan High School Years 9–13 prize recipients
Mia Reardon holding her highly commended certificate and prize
Mount Aspiring College Years 9–13 highly commended recipient Mia Reardon
James Allan holding his highly commended certificate
Mount Aspiring College Years 9–13 highly commended recipient James Allan
Arrowtown School students and adults gathered for a prize presentation
Arrowtown School Years 7–8 prize presentation
Josie Settle holding her highly commended certificate
Cromwell College Years 7–8 highly commended recipient Josie Settle
Tom Gibson-Padfield holding his highly commended certificate
Mount Aspiring College Years 7–8 highly commended recipient Tom Gibson-Padfield
Damsara Kangara and Charlie Baumgren holding their highly commended certificates and prizes
Mount Aspiring College Years 7–8 highly commended recipients Damsara Kangara and Charlie Baumgren
Chloe Biemond holding her highly commended certificate outside Clyde Primary School
Clyde Primary School Years 7–8 highly commended recipient Chloe Biemond
Emma Bartlett holding her first-place certificate and prize
Omakau Primary School Years 5–6 first-place recipient Emma Bartlett
Emma Bartlett receiving her award during a school assembly at Omakau Primary School
Omakau Primary School Presenting the Years 5–6 first-place award
Edie Harkness holding her highly commended certificate and prize
Goldfields Primary School Years 5–6 highly commended recipient Edie Harkness

From the judges

School Competition judges’ report

Judging a short story competition is a bit like Christmas – all those exciting presents wrapped up and ready to be opened. And like Christmas, it has been a delight. We’ve been very impressed with the quality of writing and the imagination shown in the stories, particularly in the mass of entries from Year 9 students. Some of you definitely have a talent for writing and we hope you’ll continue to develop this over the next few years. Well done.

There were a few ‘ingredients’ we were looking for in a good story. Obviously, you needed to stick to the rules, and some entries were let down by having only a very vague link to Central Otago. Most of the stories were well-written in terms of language and grammar, and we made allowances in some of the junior entries where a few slip-ups didn’t detract from the overall quality.

We wanted stories that grabbed our attention, and the ones that scored most highly were original or made us laugh. There were lots of stories, understandably, that centred on the gold rush, the river, the Alexandra Clock and Cromwell’s big fruit; the stories that made the cut were the ones that took a slightly different angle, that set believable characters in the familiar landscape. Character can be shown through the way people speak, and some of the stories included excellent dialogue. In general, dialogue speeds up a story and description tends to slow it down, and the best stories found a balance between the two.

The shape of the story, or its ‘arc’, is a crucial ingredient. Description on its own doesn’t make a good story – it needs to go somewhere – and the best entries not only grounded us in place but also allowed us to feel that the character had learned something or somehow changed by the end of it.

For Years 5–6 we chose Mystery in Omakau as prizewinner. The writing was confident (and competent), woven through with elements of fear and surprise, with a great twist at the end.

First place in Years 7–8 is The Postmaster. It’s original and inventive, and beautifully constructed.

Years 9–13 was a big spread in age and the quality of writing was very impressive throughout that range. First place goes to After the Thaw, for its skillful interweaving of people and nature in a natural disaster. It’s a mature and perceptive piece of writing, with strong characterisation and believable relationships. Second is 300 Kilos, a different and imaginative take on the gold rush, again with good characterisation and strongly embedded in the region. Third place goes to The Pie Perpetrator. Of all the stories we read, this one made us laugh the most – a delightfully original and imaginative piece that shows a good understanding of crime stories.

There were so many stories in all the age groups that we’d have liked to give prizes to, and our short list of highly commended and commended entries shows that there’s a lot of writing talent in the region. Keep on practising and honing your skills; even if you don’t win a prize, (and judging is always subjective), you’ll have the satisfaction of continuing to grow a skill which is not only fun but opens you to a limitless world of imagination.

Rosemary Riddell and Bridget Auchmuty

Judges

Meet the judges

Rosemary Riddell

Rosemary Riddell

Rosemary Riddell spent 30 years first as a lawyer and then, from 2006, as a judge in the Hamilton District Court. She directed the short film and feature film The Insatiable Moon, wrote To Be Fair: Confessions of a District Court Judge, and now chairs a Trust offering writers’ retreats and residencies.

Bridget Auchmuty

Bridget Auchmuty

Bridget Auchmuty lives in the Ida Valley and has written poetry and fiction ever since she could hold a pen. She has taught fiction and poetry on Creative Writing degree programmes at Nelson and Massey, and her writing has been published in Aotearoa and overseas. Her poetry collection Unmooring was published in 2020.

Annie Villiers

Annie Villiers

Annie Villiers has deep roots in Central Otago and assisted the competition as Chief Sifter. Her published works include two poetry collaborations with Dunedin artist John Z Robinson and a novel, with poems and articles published in magazines and journals nationally and internationally.